Machiavelli’s The Prince: Essay Example

Table of Contents

Niccolo Machiavelli as a Diplomat & Thinker
The Prince by Machiavelli: a Handbook for Rulers
What Should a Prince Be an Expert at?
Conclusion
The Prince by Machiavelli: FAQ
References

According to Machiavelli, what should a prince be an expert at? Keep reading to find out! In this The Prince essay example, you’ll find the summary, information about Machiavelli’s early life, and answers to frequent questions about The Prince by Machiavelli.

In the late Middle Ages and early Renaissance, Italy was in an unfavorable position. It was divided into small parts. Rome, Florence, Genoa, Venice, and other parts of the country were all independent warring states. The country was at war with such powerful states as modern-time France and Spain.

In such conditions, the most topical question was: how to strengthen the country’s power? Great thinkers of the epoch tried to find the right answer. One of the most outstanding authors of his century was Niccolo Machiavelli. In his essay “The Prince,” he wrote down a strategy for the ruler to succeed.

Niccolo Machiavelli as a Diplomat & Thinker

Who was Machiavelli? He is famous as a diplomat, philosopher, and writer. His best-known masterpiece is The Prince that he wrote in 1513. Niccolo contributed to Western thinking through a number of other essential discourses, too. He wrote a lot about the principles of warfare and diplomacy.

For many years, he served as a high-ranking official in the Florentine Republic. For example, in the years 1498 – 1512, he worked as secretary of the second chancellor. At that time, the powerful dynasty of Medici was not in power in Florence. Machiavelli witnessed how Medici II re-gained power by helping the Spanish forces defeat Florence. Machiavelli was expelled from the citystate of Florence for a year. In 1513, he went to prison. He was released after three weeks. He was engaged in diplomatic and military affairs.

Apart from his “serious” theses, Machiavelli wrote some comedies, carnival songs, and poems. His personal letters are a valuable source of information for historians and scholars.

From the facts that we know, Machiavelli seemed never to consider himself a philosopher. He even denied some philosophical studies. Neither was he satisfied with the standard model of academic philosophy. His writings were not always systematic and consistent. Instead of pure logical analysis, he often turns to experience and examples.

However, Machiavelli is usually listed among political philosophers. He tried to emphasize a pure political pragmatism. He focused on existential questions, too. Philosophers all over the world are eager to study and discuss his ideas.

The existence of the term “Machiavellianism” proves the importance of the thinker’s ideas. The term is rather widespread in both political and business spheres. It challenges the entire tradition of political philosophy. It gives a different perspective on the motives and actions of rulers.

The Prince by Machiavelli: a Handbook for Rulers

As a diplomat and thinker, Machiavelli offers some advice to the new Prince Lorenzo de’ Medici. “The Prince” essay gives a set of practical solutions in a turbulent political environment. The principles written down by Machiavelli were meant to help the Prince become influential and respected.

Lorenzo was the nephew of Giovanni de’ Medici (also known as Leo X). In 1516, Lorenzo became the duke of Urbino. The new ruler needed to develop a specific strategy to build up Florence’s prosperity. Lorenzo did not appreciate Machiavelli’s suggestions.

By the time Lorenzo came into power, the previous rulers’ mistakes had led to Italy’s division. Machiavelli recommends learning from others’ mistakes. He develops a strategy for quite an authoritarian ruler. The thinker advises the Prince to modify his ruling style. He claims that combining different methods in ruling the state is more effective. This should help the Prince expand the empire and make people from all over the state loyal to him.

According to the author, there are two main ways to gain and keep power: “Either through fortune or through strength.” The view is a bit simplified and idealistic. However, at the time people achieved power either by overthrowing others or inheriting the throne. It was too early for moral and ethical considerations to play a crucial role. Democracy was not accessible at the epoch.

Let us consider the tips proposed by Machiavelli in more detail. Conquering power through wars implies cruelty. Despite innocent victims, Machiavelli claims that it is an appropriate means to gain and keep power. The thinker gives a horrible recommendation to make sure that the previous ruler has no heirs.

In his essay, Machiavelli reflects on how love and fear help a ruler preserve power. Any leader needs obedience and loyalty of their subordinates. According to the author, Lorenzo should know how to make people like him and be afraid of him at the same time. That is arguably the main objective of a new ruler.

While everyone is unique, Machiavelli does not focus on their differences. For a ruler, it is not necessary to view their subjects as individuals. Instead, Machiavelli refers to a group of subordinates.

What regards the laws, taxes, and so on, Machiavelli argues that the new ruler should not change anything. He recommends preserving the old way of life that people are used to. Most people should be OK with it. People do not like changes. Keeping things as-is is said to be the best way for new rulers to establish hereditary possessions.

Those who served in the previous ruler’s military should become loyal to the new leader. That is a vital component of preserving the gained power. Machiavelli looks at those people as “subjects.” The function of the subjects was to help the ruler keep powerful. To accomplish this objective, military people need to protect the borders of the kingdom. The diplomat supports the use of military methods to strengthen power. Naturally, this can also protect the country.

The concept mentioned above implies that the ruler should be more artful and astute than his subjects. Otherwise, those who should obey might rebel. Meanwhile, subjects must protect the strong leader, fear his power, and avoid any confrontation with him.

Machiavelli comes up with animal metaphors to illustrate his suggestions.

When people describe someone cunning and sly, they compare that person to a fox. He believes that a ruler should possess the qualities of a fox in order to succeed. A good and wise prince should know how to win, even if the methods are not direct and just. Honesty and sincerity are not the essential qualities for a ruler, according to the thinker.

In the meantime, foxes are not the strongest animals. A lion is way more imposing and seems to have more power. Lions are often called the kings of all animals. When it comes to inspiring fear and respect, a lion is a better example for a prince.

According to Machiavelli, What Should a Prince Be an Expert at?

What is the best motive for the subjects to keep loyal to the rule? Should it be love or fear? Machiavelli claims that the ruler must inspire both fear and love. This might be challenging, of course. But the wisdom of any ruler is in finding that balance.

According to Machiavelli, those who cannot secure their position through both love and fear should choose the one they are more confident about. In the meantime, choosing one does not exclude the other. While using fear as the main source of power, the Prince should strive to win sympathy. If a ruler cannot make people love him, he will at least need to ensure he is not hated.

Another thing a prince should be an expert at is controlling the quality of the army. The soldiers should be organized and should know the rules well. Machiavelli claims that a good army reflects good laws. Sometimes fidelity of subjects is better protection for the state than a new fortress.

He notes that leaders must consider the interests of the state first. Being an expert at prioritizing is very beneficial for a ruler. He claims that a great leader aims at their state’s prosperity. The ultimate goal for Florence of that time was uniting different Italian states. Accordingly, any methods were acceptable on the way to this. But personal gains could not become the objective.

While Machiavelli emphasizes the role of a strong leader, he also recommends having wise advisors. Lorenzo di Medici was not experienced enough to run the state just on his own. That was especially true for the tough period and the crisis that Florence was going through.

The Prince: Essay Conclusion

Niccolo Machiavelli suggests how to run a state in a volatile political situation. Many recommendations imply perceiving the subjects as instruments for gaining prosperity. Some points justify cruelty as long as it takes place for a “sacred” purpose. In Machiavellianism, gaining power (victory) is the ultimate goal. Any means to reach the goal are acceptable.

A present-day reader might be unpleasantly surprised at that perception. However, Machiavelli lived in a different epoch. He did not even realize how many moral and ethical topics he touched upon. Years after The Prince essay appeared, ruthless rulers and representatives of business abused Machiavelli’s concepts to justify their actions.

The Prince by Machiavelli: FAQ

What is The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli about?

“The Prince” is an essay that focuses on the principles and recommendations for a ruler to maintain power. Some of the suggestions are only applicable to the Florence of that epoch. Other rules can arguably be universal. The work gives the basis for such a theory as Machiavellianism.

According to Machiavelli, what was his purpose in writing The Prince?

Niccolo Machiavelli believed that he was the right person to advise the new Prince. Lorenzo di Medici was to rule in a volatile and challenging political environment. He had to make difficult choices and develop an exclusive strategy to revitalize the state. Machiavelli’s thesis was aimed at conveying ideas of the author, especially to Lorenzo.

What advice does Machiavelli offer to a prince?

The author gives a few recommendations. The main idea is that any means are acceptable to achieve the primary goal. Another popular question is: according to Machiavelli, what should a prince be an expert at? A wise ruler should know how to balance the fear and love of subjects. He should also be great at prioritizing, strategizing, etc.

When did Machiavelli write The Prince?

Niccolo Machiavelli was an outstanding Italian diplomat of the Renaissance. When power was re-gained by the Medici, Machiavelli decided to share his thoughts on politics. Lorenzo di Medici did not accept the suggestions. In 1532, ‎Antonio Blado d’Asola published Machiavelli’s essay.

Why did Machiavelli advocate the use of force by a ruler?

Niccolo Machiavelli was a prominent diplomat and thinker. He lived in an epoch when Italy was divided into numerous independent and warring states. Moreover, the country was attacked by foreign conquerors. Machiavelli explained that the Prince’s objective was to restore the country’s prosperity. He emphasized that any means are acceptable to accept the goal, including the use of force.