Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
The disagreement between Hume and Kant resulted in the awakening of the latter from his dogmatic slumber since he was disturbed by Hume’s skepticism against causality. The so-called Hume’s problem was in his disbelief in cause-effect relationships due to the fact that people can see only a row of events following one another rather than the connection between them. In this way, he thought it to be unreasonable to claim the existence of causality based on simple observations. Kant disagreed with him by saying that causality is not an illusion, and he decided to prove that it is real by using the methods rejected by Hume.
According to Kant, the experience of the world implies causation, and it is essential as its feature, not an objective measure. The philosopher’s attempts to solve Hume’s problem led to the conclusion that this notion can be considered only through the lens of one’s experience and thereby confirmed. However, in order to prove the existence of causality, it is vital to organize the thinking process in a logical way to receive an accurate outcome. Thus, the reliable way to conceive the world is to apply logic to one’s experience, and it proves the causal connections between events.
The intention of Kant resulted in the creation of another perspective on the problem. However, it did not actually solve it since he did not provide justification for the non-use of action and the sufficiency of the operation of thought for conceiving the world. Therefore, the two perspectives presented by Hume and Kant are merely the ways to consider reality either from the point of the necessity to prove cause-effect relationships in practice or the use of logical thinking for the same objective.
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.