Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
The behavior model in the Utku family shows typical Eskimo traits such as the man’s dominant role and respect for older family members. However, in the Inuttiaq family, there are differences from this pattern in the very favorable treatment of children. A characteristic feature of behavior in the Utku family was calmness and neutrality, which can be seen in Inuttiaq’s condescending reaction to his new daughter’s failures in learning (Briggs, 1971, p. 1359). In addition, it is necessary to consider that there was also a soft attitude toward the younger family members, as could be seen in the daughter’s behavior. She protested against being braided and had no reprimands from her parents (Briggs, 1971, p. 1116). Another characteristic of family behavior is ignoring family members when doing one’s chores, which was not observed when Inuttiac referred to family members (Briggs, 1971, p. 1616). A common characteristic of Utku was the different family interactions at other times of the year. The families interacted actively in summer and kept mainly a typical household, while in winter, they were almost wholly separated (Briggs, 1971, p. 1740). Generally, the Inuttiaq family is typical of the Utku, but a calm attitude towards children distinguishes it.
Comparing Inuttiaq with the head of the family I grew up in, it is possible to identify several standard and distinctive features. The most distinct similarities include a respectful attitude toward the head of the family. Nevertheless, the influence level of the family head in my case was not as high compared to the Utku. Pronounced neutrality in any situation is instead a distinguishing factor. In my family, a more emotional interaction model is realized, including negative and positive reactions. This aspect’s most significant distinctive feature is ignoring other family members while in the same space. However, it is necessary to specify the limitation associated with living conditions since the Utku tents and igloos do not allow for the separate accommodation of family members (Briggs, 1971, p. 1562). In general, the role of Inuttiaq has similar features to the head of the family where I grew up. Nevertheless, this role in the Utku family features a greater degree of patriarchal tendencies and peculiar attitudes toward relatives.
Reference
Briggs, J. L. (1971). Never in anger: Portrait of an Eskimo family [eBook edition]. Harvard University Press. Web.
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.